Subject: Re: Kerberized rlogin?
To: Aaron Brown <abrown@eecs.harvard.edu>
From: Bill Studenmund <skippy@macro.stanford.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 05/16/1996 09:14:51
On Wed, 15 May 1996, Aaron Brown wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Is there any reason that a kerberized version of rlogin is not included
> in src/domestic? We run a kerberos shop here, except that most of our 
> machines only accept kerberos rlogin sessions, not kerberized telnet (or
> at least they won't accept NetBSD's kerberized telnet). I noticed that
> the source for rlogin in the tree has some #ifdef KERBEROS stuff commented
> out; when I added it in to the Makefile, it refused to build because of 
> one argument mismatch flagged by -Werror and because of a missing des_rw.c
> file for encrypted rlogin. I got it to compile and work by commenting
> out the encryption-function-calls and by removing -Werror (of course,
> encryption doesn't work). 

While we're discussing kerberos, I'm wanting to get it to run on my
mac IIsi (NetBSD & ppp are functioning quite nicely). Having just spoken
with the campus computing folks, my question is now much better posed :-)
: Do we have Transarc String-to-key support built in? If I have the patch,
would it apply cleanly (I realize that'd depend on the patch too)?

Thanks!

Bill