not that i agree or disagree with this proposal ...

   Speaking of killing processes by name, if we can replace more(1) with a
   slightly hacked less(1),

actually, our more(1) has _always_ been a `slightly [and
a bit] hacked' less(1). i just updated to a newer version
of less, but, in doing so took the opertunity to build the
program as less as well, and thus keep it in it's own source
tree.