> > > It seems it would be a good idea to start splitting the MI R* code out
> > > and making a common pool for it, since two ports now use it...
> [...]
> > can begin looking at it. Has anyone else worked on this? Are other
> > ports (e.g. 68k) doing this?
> 
> [...]
> I think the port masters of all the m68k ports should get together and
> work the parts out, that could be shared between the ports. After all, this
> is the area where NetBSD has it's biggest potential.

...and would be an excellent move toward enabling a NeXT cube/station port
of NetBSD, the one platform that would _truly_ benefit from the performance
gain that NetBSD has to offer.

I guess I should pick up K&R again, and figure out how that damn "Hello
World" works...  ;^)

>   Guenther

David Hopper (bard@tiamat.chaldea.com) : http://tiamat.chaldea.com 
Anthropology Department, Stanford University
NetBSD 1.1 (tiamat.chaldea.com) : NEXTSTEP 3.3 (marduk.chaldea.com)
"Two pale drops of fire guttering in the vast consuming darkness"-V. Price