Subject: Re: Memory leak?
To: None <greywolf@captech.com>
From: David <david@mono.org>
List: current-users
Date: 02/10/1996 21:57:51
On Fri, 9 Feb 1996, Open Carefully -- Contents Under Pressure wrote:

> By the way, having NetBSD/sparc is misleading; sparc architectures include
> sun4, sun4m, sun4c, sun4d, and sun4u.  They are all considered "sparc".
> I think we should consider moving "sparc" to "sun4c" in order to keep the
> architectures straight.
> 
	Given the GENERIC NetBSD/sparc runs on sun4 & sun4c machines (and will
	likely run on sun4m too when the work is done) I think the naming is
	about right.
	(Maybe in the future there _might_ be a NetBSD/ultrasparc port if
	if the ultrasparc cpu is radically different, but I know nowt about
	that so will not comment :)


                   David/abs             (david@mono.org)

+44 181 888 8949 System Manager, Southern Studios Ltd, Box 59, London N22 1AR
     >=- Microsoft asks you where you want to go. Unix gets you there -=<
        <<< Monochrome - Largest UK Internet BBS - telnet mono.org >>>