In article <9602092318.AA23023@cthulhu> Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com> writes:
>
>>Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 16:23:19 -0500 (EST)
>>From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
>
>>I attempted to build a kernel without COMPAT_43 and was repaid with
>>this during the make. Simply putting back the COMPAT_43 fixed
>>it. Something tells me this shouldn't be the case. Should I send-pr this?
>
>>../../../../../../compat/common/tty_43.c: In function `ttcompat':
>>../../../../../../compat/common/tty_43.c:96: `TIOCGETP' undeclared (first use this function)
>
>I got this too.  You need to
>
>#include <ioctl_compat.h>
>
>explicitly in tty_43.c.  I've told Christos about this, but I haven't
>gotten around to send-pr'ing it yet.  Go ahead. :-)

It is in there. Unfortunately, I cannot syncronize the supscan with the
voluminous changes... Please be patient; I am trying to make the changes
one logical entity at a time, but this sometimes is not that easy...

christos