Subject: Re: C Language Standard(s)
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG, sjg@zen.void.oz.au>
From: Peter Seebach <seebs@solon.com>
List: current-users
Date: 01/09/1996 05:48:02
The __P has the definite down side that it looks ugly, and that in some
cases a compiler not-gcc may complain if the K&R style definition means
a different thing than the prototype;
int foo(short);
followed by
int foo(x)
	short x;
{
...
}

is not happy for some compilers.

-s