> Are there any plans to update the semantics of the sticky bit such that
> if it is used on a file without execute permission, the blocks of that file
> are *not* cached (as in swap files for diskless clients), or have we not

Sounds like the rules of "Fizzbin" (sp?) [StarTrek,
"A Piece of the Action", stardate 4598.0] - amusing.

> reached the server-of-diskless-clients mode yet?
>
> Yeah, I know about the drawbacks of diskless environments, but just in case,
> are we making any moves to be able to support such environments?
>
>
>
>                                 --*greywolf;

Elch ==:-)

-- 
elchin@boss1.physik.uni-bonn.de                 [131.220.161.41]  (Internet)
elch@boss1.physik.uni-bonn.de

Elche sind auch nur Tiere ==:-)