> At 01:16 PM 9/26/95 +1000, you wrote:
> >   (Incidentally, since it has been a long time since 1.0, I think NetBSD
> >   can get away with calling this release 2.0, if we want to keep up on
> >   major version numbers with you-know-who ;->)
> >
> >i totally disagree.  if anything we should call it 4.5
> No way!  It should be called NetBSD95 ;-))

How about NetBSD-TNG?

d
-- 
David Leonard                            Project Officer, DSTC
The University of Queensland             leonard@dstc.edu.au
http://www.dstc.edu.au/WP/staff/david-leonard.html