Subject: Re: Comparison of OS for PC's
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Iain Hibbert <plunky@skate.demon.co.uk>
List: current-users
Date: 09/02/1995 12:25:00
According to Mike Long:
> >and the loader generates the code on the fly as it loads..
>
> The OSF has something like this. They call it ANDF
> (Architecture-Neutral Distribution format). The intention is to be
> able to distribute one binary for multiple systems/architectures,
> without having to reveal proprietary source code. It's similar to the
> RTL that gcc uses to communicate between its front- and back ends.
>
> IMHO, the equivalent of a compiler back end would be a bit much to
> stick into the kernel. :-)
this is true, though the results of the system that was tested was that
the executables were much smaller, and loaded quicker.. so you lose a
bit on kernel bloat but gain much on binary sizes..
I found the web reference too..
<http://www.inf.ethz.ch/department/publications/diss.html>
]ain