> Let's change the question: Why not include tcsh in the default
> distribuition ?  Some may not like tcsh, but other may.  It's
> something like choosing between sh, bash, sh5 and ksh, I think. :)

... and while we're at it, why not include:
	bash
	ksh (pdksh)
	rc
	ash (the adventure shell)
etc...  You may not like the adventure shell; i think it's sort of
fun.  And Charles likes rc.  8-)

There's no reason to include tcsh, and it's just as easily obtained
precompiled as a package, or obtained as source and then compiled.



chris