Subject: Re: config & vice config.old & config
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: der Mouse <>
List: current-users
Date: 04/23/1995 18:26:05
> If is the prefered kernel configurator, and config is
> "being phased out", is there any reason not to rename config to
> config.old and to config?

On a port which has been switched over to, no, unless you
care about compatability.  On a port which hasn't, yes, unless you like
typing "config.old" all the time.

Or such is my understanding: that you cannot use on a kernel
designed to be configured with config, and vice versa.  If I'm wrong,
I'm sure someone who does know the truth will cheerfully correct me!

If this is so, then, config is "being phased out" only in the sense
that more and more ports are being converted to, and new
ports should probably use it.

					der Mouse