Subject: Re: Building gcc-2.5.8
To: None <current-users@sun-lamp.cs.berkeley.edu, s_grau@ira.uka.de>
From: None <mycroft@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 05/13/1994 10:03:07 
   What about incorporating a more up-to-date gcc than gcc-2.4.5 into
   the source tree?

Is there something *wrong* with the one currently in the tree?  It seems
to work just fine for everything I've built.

Updating for the sake of updating is silly; it leads to more bugs and
more of our time wasted.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------