> The source license is not that expensive for universities.  I work for
> the university, and do have access to the source code, but only for
> 1.2 ... which will _not_ compile under R6 (and work correctly).  
> 
> I'm waiting for the uni. to get the 2.x source, and then I'll start
> working on it....

We have the sources for 2.0, but what it's worth? They are licensed
to our faculty, and I guess (I haven't seen the legal blurb of the OSF
yet) it is not allowed to give away *anything* of them. This would of
course include the sources, but also shared libraries for any architecture,
include-files, probably not even statically linked binaries (this would
make the status of the Mosaic in X11R6.04Jan95-NotXConsortium very
questionable).

Right now I can't find anything on this topic in the source tree, and
the paperized documentation is not available for me at the moment, but
maybe someone can enlighten me (and others) in this question.

-- 
     Joern Clausen                  email: joern@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE