Subject: Re: patch failed
To: Mailing List <labstp23@di.unito.it (Marco Musso), amiga-x@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Michael L. Hitch <osymh@gemini.oscs.montana.edu>
List: amiga-x
Date: 03/03/1995 08:29:44
On Mar 3, 10:01am, Marco Musso wrote:
> First, the use of binpatch is a little bit strange:
...
> [0]8.Work:NetBSD> binpatch -s _rh_default_gfx -r 1 netbsd.pat
> _rh_default_gfx(0xb4e84): 4 (0x4)
> [0]8.Work:NetBSD> binpatch -s _rh_default_gfx -r 1 netbsd.pat
> _rh_default_gfx(0xb4e84): 4 (0x4)
>
> [a second issue of the command return the same value, why ?]
That's because there is a bug in that version of binpatch. You
need to use the alternate form:
binpatch -s _rh_default_grx=1 netbsd.pat
> Well, I think that we (NetBSD Amiga _users_) need a more flexible
> handling of X resolutions (and related parameters) , maybe with a
> Xconfig file like Linux (with a more "human" default :-).
The ECS servers allow setting the width & height as command line
arguments to the server.
> Maybe you could answer also to this question (not X related, sorry):
> Why this fstab entry doesn't mount the ados partitions ?
>
> /dev/sd1a / ufs rw 1 1
> /dev/sd1d /mnt/wb ados ro 0 2
> /dev/sd1e /mnt/work ados ro 0 2
> /dev/sd1f /usr ufs rw 1 2
> /dev/sd0d /mnt/transito ados ro 0 2
> /dev/sd0e /mnt/temp ados ro 0 2
> /dev/fd0a /mnt/df0 ados ro 0 2
>
> mount_ados says that "ro" is an unknown option...
If you are using the 1.0 version of mount_ados, it doesn't have a
read-only option. The adosfs mount routine didn't enforce a read-only
mount even though the file system was read-only.
The current kernel requires that the mount specify read-only, which
the old mount_ados can not do. To mount ados partitions with the current
kernel requires a newer version of mount_ados that accepts the ro option.
Michael
--
Michael L. Hitch INTERNET: osymh@montana.edu
Computer Consultant
Office of Systems and Computing Services
Montana State University Bozeman, MT USA