christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:

> In article <20030305014408.K3346@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>,
> David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk> wrote:
> >> I like it, but what letter do you propose for listing all lwps on a process?
> >
> >Dunno, what did 's' stand for?
> >How about 't' for Thread? or 'W' for lWp? 'f' for Full (for SYSV freaks)
> 
> t for thread sounds better to me than the current s. Choosing t, will free s
> for sort.

t is taken, for tty ("ps -t00").

        - Nathan