Subject: Re: xemacs-packages
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Min Sik Kim <minskim@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 02/15/2004 16:47:17
--Signature=_Sun__15_Feb_2004_16_47_17_-0600_USv=9_Rt8tNB5mcs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

* Jan Schaumann:
> Michal Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> wrote:
>  
> > The perfect solution would be propably to make a separate pkg for each
> > xemacs package, together with some wisely crafted meta packages.
> 
> Yes, I think that would be desirable.  You may want to take a look at
> the emacs-packages package as well as the sawfish-themes package for two
> different approaches.

I like having one meta package and seperate packages for lisp packages
as emacs-packages does.  We can still provide a SAWFISH_THEMES-like
variable to customize the meta-package.

-- 
Min Sik Kim

--Signature=_Sun__15_Feb_2004_16_47_17_-0600_USv=9_Rt8tNB5mcs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQC/29vQsKR/Zi7L+AQLNuAf9HkCQ2yFih8CqXVLaVa7Evvx9q5PoH+wq
NwxMketyGHpoa5+jKOyS6siAu0krtvByw3Qg/Q+H6G7hEHFp5xISJCW2D6IdWpjB
sQhH1sIbYHPWAFIvbC2M/9LrDLlxvecgLlQt0Eufkq8Hy37LOBO1mNKtvEESmkk7
w0yPxEsizErenDOotFjhzdPpi2ZX6SDGSupG+FRsRl9VWuMnlGzyJgWd6oEra23r
GyOSz8pbiH8dtzLTZV4fKiG2waJw+PBfBGadd1WU/P6vQaoREilCp2W0It6c+FCC
rGD58PYy8K7i4zvvljxrcuoFmrajHJSVvkmDfKisnxnXh7wYhJpYzQ==
=bxLy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sun__15_Feb_2004_16_47_17_-0600_USv=9_Rt8tNB5mcs--