[ On Sunday, June 9, 2002 at 18:20:36 (+0200), Lubomir Sedlacik wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: mozilla stability (or lack thereof) vs. gdk-pixbuf.
>
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 12:15:32PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > Now if I'm not grossly mistaken gdk-pixbuf replaces Imlib.  The
> > Mozilla documentation says mozilla uses "Imagelib" to load images.  Is
> > graphics/imlib the same as what they call "Imagelib"?  Is Imagelib
> > more robust?
> 
> http://www.libpr0n.com/
> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/libimage/libpr0n.html

Are you saying we should be using libpr0n, aka libimg2, instead of gdk-pixbuf?

(from what I read on the links above I would agree -- I'm just not clear
on exactly what API is used/needed and how all these things relate)

-- 
								Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;  <gwoods@acm.org>;  <g.a.woods@ieee.org>;  <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>