Re: RFC 6926

[Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>]

Matthias Scheler <tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost> writes:

>       Hello,
>
> it seems that NetBSD's TCP implementation still follows RFC 3390
> and uses 4 as the initial TCP congestion window size.
>
> RFC 6928 increased the the initial size to 10. Is there any reason
> not to change NetBSD's default accordingly?

That's EXPERIMENTAL, not PROPOSED STANDARD.  What do the standards
track congestion control documents say about actually doing it (vs an
experimental RFC)?