Re: high load, no bottleneck

To: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: high load, no bottleneck
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:19:34 +0000

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 08:13:42AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> There is at least one thing: RAIDframe doesn't allow enough simultaneously
> pending transactions, so everything *really* backs up behind the cache flush.
> 
> Fixing that would require allowing RAIDframe to eat more RAM.  Last time I
> proposed that, I got a rather negative response here.

It could be optionnal so that everyone is happy, couldn't it?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: high load, no bottleneck
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: high load, no bottleneck
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: high load, no bottleneck
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon

Prev by Date: Re: Weird memory usage, performance problem with 6.1_STABLE
Next by Date: Re: high load, no bottleneck
Previous by Thread: Re: high load, no bottleneck
Next by Thread: Re: high load, no bottleneck
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index