>> The point of SCN is not to be "compatible", but to be "user
>> friendly".
> And this is where everyone misses the point.  Any time you edit a
> text file in a free-form editor, it's not "user friendly" pretty much
> by definition.

*Whose* definition?  It's sure a lot closer than imposing an editor
designed by someone with very different user-interaction preferences.

Unless, of course, the text file has stringent syntax requirements
which are difficult for humans to deal with, which brings us back to
non-XML textifications, such as SCN.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B