Subject: RE: GPT support still needed? (was: RE: Recursive partitioning)
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: De Zeurkous <zeurkous@nichten.info>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/06/2007 18:50:44
Haai,
On Wed, June 6, 2007 18:44, der Mouse wrote:
>>[snip]
>
> Perhaps, but phrasing it that way is misleading. It makes it sound as
> though the copy-on-write-ness will lift the limit, which it won't; it's
> using wider-than-32-bit values that will, whether or not there is
> anything like copy-on-write going on.
The former implies the latter -- that why I've phrased it that way. Logic
> verbosity.
Baai,
De Zeurkous
-----------
Friggin' Machines!
>
> /~\ The ASCII der Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
> X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
> / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>