--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[No need to CC me on post's to mailing lists unless I ask for it.]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 04:49:07PM +0930, Brett Lymn wrote:
> Judging from the last two or was it 3 times this was discussed, the
> cats went in all directions.  Everyone wants something different.  The
> people who were proposing the added functionality just got battered
> until they gave up.

Well, lets not do that, then. Let's accept whatever implementation
works, assuming it's mostly sane, and go from there.

> 1) make the scrollback optional so that people who want to whine about
> kernel bloat can option it out.

Sensible.

> 2) Support both styles (holdscreen and or special key combos)
> selectable by an option (either flag or kernel option)

Sure, but not as a flag or kernel option. This is the kind of thing
we have wsconsctl(8) for.

> 3) make the keys that perform the action configurable but set a
> reasonable default that will cover the bulk the keyboards out
> there... acknowledge that this will piss some people off but you WILL
> NOT be able to satisfy everyone.

Well, how 'bout vi(1) keys then? ;^>

Just kidding. I agree. Again, wsconsctl(8).

--=20
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE9Cenl9ehacAz5CRoRAlLqAJ9D4fO9f9t3mIFei203pNur0nV4UQCdH3PM
YYf5SdblTp2dfr9KIUya2UU=
=HafR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--