[forwarded to port-i386 for informational purpose]


-- 
Want to get a clue on IPv6 but don't know where to start? Try this:
* Basics -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/05/24/ipv6_tutorial.html
* Setup  -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/06/01/ipv6_tutorial.html
Of course with your #1 IPv6 ready operating system -> http://www.NetBSD.org/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 20:47:10 +1000
From: Daniel Byrnes <mrdbyrnes@optusnet.com.au>
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
Subject: Re: g4u memory requirements?

Hi,

Tried both the 1.6.1 and the current and neither would boot. 1.6.1 had
the same memory error. I could not get the current to boot as it said
disk 2 was not from the volume I had a look around and couldn't find a
newer version so I think we can say it is too hard.

The machine is happily booting freebsd at present and it has run
mandrake 8.2 in the last year. It would have been nice to ghost the disk
as it is my firewall. However I think I will just tar up /etc and move
it to another machine.

Thanks for your help and your interest.

I have used g4u on 3 other machines here without any dramas it is really
cool.

Cheers
Dan

Hubert Feyrer wrote:

>[CC:d to port-i386 as this should be fixed/looked at]
>
>
>On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Dan Byrnes wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Hubert,
>>
>>Thanks for the reply. I'll do my best to send yu the type script it is a
>>little hard as the machine never gets up for long enough for me to get
>>the text off it.
>>
>> >> Memory: 639/64512 k
>>Press return to boot now, any other key for boot menu
>>booting fd0a:netbsd - starting in 0
>>warning: too little memory available; have 651264 bytes, want 2097152 bytes
>>running in degraded mode
>>press a key to confirm
>>
>>
>>Then the machines crashes I have had kernel panics, in this instance I get
>>UVM: pid 1 (init), uid 0 killed: out of swap
>>
>>The PC is a DEC celebris GL5100, This was a nice PC in its day. I have
>>no problems running freeBSD on it but I'm wondering if there is
>>something in its hardware that it upsetting netBSD.
>>It has onboard SCSI, sound card and matrox video card. However it is
>>using an IDE harddrive at present.
>>Would any of these things trip up your netBSD kernel?
>>
>>
>
>I'd say no, and the message you get doesn't indicate that either.
>It seems the machine has som weird memory layout that NetBSD can't detect
>it, at least not in the version used in the latest g4u release.
>
>Can you grab a NetBSD 1.6.1 and NetBSD-current bootfloppy and see what
>happens? You can get the floppies at:
>
>1.6.1:
>ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-1.6.1/i386/installation/floppy/boot1.fs
>ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-1.6.1/i386/installation/floppy/boot2.fs
>
>-current:
>ftp://releng.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/current/200304170000/i386/installation/floppy/boot1.fs
>ftp://releng.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/current/200304170000/i386/installation/floppy/boot2.fs
>
>Now that 1.6.1 is out, I think of doing a new g4u release, and I wonder if
>I should base it on NetBSD 1.6.1 or on -current. Your input may influence
>that decision - thanks in advance! :)
>
>
> - Hubert
>
>
>
>
>>Cheers
>>Dan
>>
>>Hubert Feyrer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Daniel Byrnes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>When using g4u 1.8 on this machine it boots OK but then warns that there
>>>>is not enough memory. It says it wants over 200 Mb. It tried to run in a
>>>>delimited state but a panic and reboots.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Um, I've never seen this, and esp. on a machine machine with as much RAM
>>>As 64 MB, no shortage of RAM should occur. Can you please send me a
>>>typescript of the output you get, with a few lines of context?
>>>
>>>
>>>- Hubert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
>>SPAM: This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been altered
>>SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
>>SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
>>SPAM:
>>SPAM: Content analysis details:   (-5.70 hits, 5 required)
>>SPAM: IN_REP_TO          (-0.8 points) Found a In-Reply-To header
>>SPAM: USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA (-0.6 points) User-Agent header indicates a non-spam MUA (Mozilla)
>>SPAM: REFERENCES         (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
>>SPAM: USER_AGENT         (-0.5 points) Found a User-Agent header
>>SPAM: X_ACCEPT_LANG      (-0.2 points) Found a X-Accept-Language header
>>SPAM: NetBSD             (-2.0 points) BODY: NetBSD rulez!
>>SPAM: EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION  (-1.6 points) BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution
>>SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_01_02  (0.5 points)  BODY: Spam phrases score is 01 to 02 (low)
>>SPAM:                    [score: 1]
>>SPAM:
>>SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Dan Byrnes
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~mrdbyrnes




SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
SPAM: This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
SPAM:
SPAM: Content analysis details:   (-5.70 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: IN_REP_TO          (-0.8 points) Found a In-Reply-To header
SPAM: USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA (-0.6 points) User-Agent header indicates a non-spam MUA (Mozilla)
SPAM: REFERENCES         (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
SPAM: USER_AGENT         (-0.5 points) Found a User-Agent header
SPAM: X_ACCEPT_LANG      (-0.2 points) Found a X-Accept-Language header
SPAM: NetBSD             (-2.0 points) BODY: NetBSD rulez!
SPAM: EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION  (-1.6 points) BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution
SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_02_03  (0.8 points)  BODY: Spam phrases score is 02 to 03 (medium)
SPAM:                    [score: 2]
SPAM: SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE (-0.3 points) Short signature present (no empty lines)
SPAM:
SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------