Subject: Re: SLIP connection
To: A. Wik <awik@gmx.net>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-i386
Date: 03/12/2001 09:59:50
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:47:04AM +0200, A. Wik wrote:

> > Try: route add 192.168.1.2 127.0.0.1. Do the same on the PC (with the .=
1,
> > of course)
>=20
> After I did so, the machines could ping their own sl0 interface addresses.
> But why doesn't the Ethernet interface need a route to 127.0.0.1?=20

Hm. It _should_ be set up on first use... but maybe this only works for
broadcast devices.

Regards,
	-is

--=20
 * Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from
   smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of
   smart terminals.  -- obs@burnout.demon.co.uk (obscurity)

--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBOqyQAzCn4om+4LhpAQFzswgAiEG/NWZuVrCZrlWrSYtgnxgeCycL06jU
RTuqPDPZaAXJF8p1kKg+yaHC4uAz3KYaHIlOggfl3UPSr83jICvsT6q5UOWnSEG4
O8IMPQXspAor/Qa9/Y5QoZ3DY23XqceFhJ3a04r23f6f6L+EIIPrW9pZs+nk3Qkj
A926Sc+tdaBLcTFbuC8oxUEH0BqDeM9HuHfePpDifYQ15ySJCyN7197RakWfGaw3
ldYLFamY4QNjr27C4DNaCwyzHQGDqPLx4YMsjck1YkJmm5Zzovcvd00X6EsXdU5V
cMs2VDv1BulxkqUgS0FrMVHIiZoeYoXGgFls8r7N4ZYhBf+Kau4Mhg==
=hoSZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--