Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg

[Christopher Pinon <cjpinon%secondfloor.xyz@localhost>]

Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost> wrote:

> Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> wrote:
> >Right now building e.g emacs26 fails on pkgbuild because of librsvg
> >because of rust because of (not enough randomness AND rust is piggy
> >about randomness).  While that should be fixed, it's been almost two
> >months, and as far as I know it isn't.
> 
> You could build with:
> 
> LIBRSVG_TYPE=c

Yes, but this strategy is that of clinging to a version of librsvg that
has been unsupported by upstream for more than 2.5 years (and which
apparently has security bugs).

C.