Re: npf questions

[Hauke Fath <hf%spg.tu-darmstadt.de@localhost>]

On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:14:18 +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 09:49:39AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> I don't see why part of npf is built in and the other part isn't.
> 
> Indeed, for architectures supported by bpfjit (and where it works) they
> should go together.

Is there a technical reason why bpfjit is modules-only, or is it just 
somebody's conviction that modules are the bees' knees?

Spoken as somebody who will stick to monolithic kernels on his 
servers...

Cheerio,
Hauke

(who runs pf(4), since npf(4) is not feature complete.)

-- 
     The ASCII Ribbon Campaign                    Hauke Fath
()     No HTML/RTF in email            Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
/\     No Word docs in email                     TU Darmstadt
     Respect for open standards              Ruf +49-6151-16-21344