Re: incorrect super block w recent changes

[mlh%goathill.org@localhost (MLH)]

> >So is this a valid error? This drive was partitioned using the
> >NetBSD installer a while back so maybe things have changed?
> 
> I don't know, can you run dumpfs on it and post the results?
> If wd0 is the same, do it for both...

wd0 is FFSv2 and I thought wd1 is FFSv1. Not sure what you are
looking for.

wd0e mounts fine  : >fs->fs_cgsize: 0x4000, fs_cgsize : 0x4000
wd0f mounts fine  : >fs->fs_cgsize: 0x8000, fs_cgsize : 0x8000
wd1e mounts fine  : >fs->fs_cgsize: 0x4000, fs_cgsize : 0x4000
wd1f fails        : >fs->fs_cgsize: 0x4000, fs_cgsize : 0x4800


file system: /dev/rwd1e
format  FFSv1
endian  little-endian
magic   11954           time    Mon Apr 27 21:15:48 2015
superblock location     8192    id      [ 4f0f5203 4cbba5a3 ]
cylgrp  dynamic inodes  4.4BSD  sblock  FFSv2   fslevel 4
nbfree  2976641 ndir    71728   nifree  8584892 nffree  196963  

file system: /dev/rwd1f
format  FFSv1
endian  little-endian
magic   11954           time    Mon Apr 27 20:44:07 2015
superblock location     8192    id      [ 4f11f067 131b65e8 ]
cylgrp  dynamic inodes  4.4BSD  sblock  FFSv2   fslevel 4
nbfree  18042732        ndir    48773   nifree  50365910        nffree  36713


as compared with wd0e which mounts fine on all partitions

file system: /dev/rwd0e
format  FFSv2
endian  little-endian
location 65536  (-b 128)
magic   19540119        time    Mon Apr 27 21:12:01 2015
superblock location     65536   id      [ 54875a10 36aa1af2 ]
cylgrp  dynamic inodes  FFSv2   sblock  FFSv2   fslevel 5
nbfree  507082  ndir    2179    nifree  1194404 nffree  1658

file system: /dev/rwd0f
format  FFSv2
endian  little-endian
location 65536  (-b 128)
magic   19540119        time    Mon Apr 27 21:11:57 2015
superblock location     65536   id      [ 54875a12 1b3d7e20 ]
cylgrp  dynamic inodes  FFSv2   sblock  FFSv2   fslevel 5
nbfree  26614256        ndir    292235  nifree  55388136        nffree  148247