On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 02:42:16 +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:

> Jan Schaumann wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for catching this and the other instances.  However, shouldn't a
> > top-level 'make' generated these?  If so, then it seems somewhere make
> > is not recursing correctly...
> 
> For different reasons, I did a "make clean; make" at the top level and
> then looked at the differences from "cvs diff", that's how I found those
> files... and a few other problems I am investigating right now :-(
> 
> So there's nothing wrong with the recursion itself but I guess we do not
> - and maybe cannot - have all dependencies for all the files.

Seems like some ctime mess after CVS update...

--
Mishka.