[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
RE: CVS commit: xsrc/external/mit/xf86-video-ati/dist
I just can't believe that! A missing Makefile rule?
I'm courious. Just tap me if this is the wrong list to ask such question!
ISO quality standards a few moments ago about collecting data to find
the source of problems and avoid them make me think: how could it
Maybe... stress? =P
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:57:13 +0200
> From: wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost
> To: tech-x11%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: CVS commit: xsrc/external/mit/xf86-video-ati/dist
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:23:52AM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 04:33:33PM +0000, Robert Swindells wrote:
> > > Module Name: xsrc
> > > Committed By: rjs
> > > Date: Sun Jun 3 16:33:33 UTC 2012
> > >
> > > Update of /cvsroot/xsrc/external/mit/xf86-video-ati/dist
> > > In directory ivanova.netbsd.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20142
> > >
> > > Log Message:
> > > initial import of xf86-video-ati-6.14.4
> > I've upgraded from a snapshot 20120601 to one 20120610.
> > When I now start X, the monitors turn off.
> For those watching on the sidelines: rjs fixed it by his Makefile
> commit (one file wasn't compiled into the Xserver).
Main Index |
Thread Index |