Well, i was checking suse repository occasonally, and it was NOT working a
week ago. Just tried today, and it worked.

Do you think the only difference (what suse team did) is just to collect PCI
ID from users? I mean could it be OK to use suse source by editing master
site section in your package ?

Thank you in advance fro your help.

Regards,





Juan RP wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 14:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
> "C. K." <ck74@operamail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hello!
>> 
>> Suse and Ati do great work and in short period of time, radeonhd bugs are
>> fixed mostly. Radeonhd driver currently works if i connect an extenal
>> monitor on my fedora-installed notebook.
>> 
>> 
>> I would like to switch NetBSD as sson as possible without using ANY
>> binary
>> driver. 4.99.31 is runing using vesa mode but it does not support
>> 1280x800
>> mode.
>> 
>> 
>> Now, i am asking "how to implement radeonhd driver to use in NetBSD". As
>> you know, the original driver is for Xorg while NetBSD uses XF86.
> 
> Good news... I'm currently using the radeonhd driver (a snapshot
> from 20070920) downloaded from the debian repository.
> 
> I had to add the PCI ID in order to make it start, pkg is available at:
> 
> http://www.netbsd.org/~xtraeme/xf86-video-radeonhd.tar.gz
> 
> -- 
> Juan Romero Pardines	- The NetBSD Project
> http://plog.xtrarom.org	- NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RadeonHD-from-opensuse---to-NetBSD-tf4581173.html#a13078561
Sent from the tech-x11 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.