Subject: XFree86 vs X.org
To: None <tech-x11@NetBSD.org>
From: Valeriy E. Ushakov <uwe@NetBSD.org>
Date: 12/15/2005 07:34:09
Core has considered the question of switching xsrc to X.org instead of
XFree86. We feel that targeting that switch for NetBSD 4.0 would be
problematic, because X.org tree undergoes some major changes, like
e.g. switch to GNU auto-tools. For NetBSD 4.0 at least we want to
stick with XFree86 as our xsrc, while continuing to track progress of
X.org, and porting fixes to our xsrc tree as necessary.
X.org continues to be available via pkgsrc.
In order to be able to switch to X.org after NetBSD 4.0 the following
4 targets need to be met:
Either by our existing reach-over framework, or auto-conf tools.
src/x11 support for compiling X.org is on the branch, but it needs
to be updated for the new releases of X.org.
2. Stability of the X.org code base
X.org has introduced quite a few regressions over XFree86 code.
3. Native server support
While X.org has support for newer and more cards, the
cross-platform support is lacking. We should try to port our
existing servers that X.org does not have.
4. Strategic direction of X.org
There is currently discussion within the X.org project about
deleting the pseudo-color display support code from the Xserver.
Such changes will automatically break support for older hardware.
While we understand that in the future older cards may not be
supported we believe that this change is immature. The earlier we
start porting NetBSD servers (see #3), the more chances we have to
have impact on that decision.
SY, Uwe (on behalf of core@)
email@example.com | Zu Grunde kommen
http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen