--yQDbd2FCF2Yhw41T
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Salut,

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:27:48AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Michael wrote:
> >Exactly. Yes, they still ship them, and yes they're pretty much
> >outdated. I'd be surprised if they compile out of the box on any halfway
> >recent NetBSD at all.
>=20
> So what's the solution for NetBSD here - merge in newer XFree into xsrc?=
=20
> Merge in modules from X.org into our xsrc? Migrate xsrc to x.org? ...?
>=20
> I think keeping as much from xsrc as it is right now would be desirable,=
=20
> dunno if that's possible, while shipping as much code as possible in a=20
> standard install (i.e. no pkgs, patch & compile orgies etc. required to=
=20
> get things going).

No, XFree86/XOrg are completely unrelated. This is about the direct renderi=
ng
module. The point anholt was trying to make was that we shouldn't use the D=
RM
shipped with XFree86, but the one I have ported and am updating to the core
variant now.

				Tonnerre

--yQDbd2FCF2Yhw41T
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCpM5pXUVlAbfmNMIRAt1LAKCEnamKl0TYKP9OtCUG+59HQtfE1gCg3s7v
TKPMYbQ0uWgDSJbSsDbJue4=
=Elwb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yQDbd2FCF2Yhw41T--