Subject: Re: DRI [was: Re: more summer of code fun]
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Tonnerre <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/07/2005 00:30:01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:27:48AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Michael wrote:
> >Exactly. Yes, they still ship them, and yes they're pretty much
> >outdated. I'd be surprised if they compile out of the box on any halfway
> >recent NetBSD at all.
> So what's the solution for NetBSD here - merge in newer XFree into xsrc?=
> Merge in modules from X.org into our xsrc? Migrate xsrc to x.org? ...?
> I think keeping as much from xsrc as it is right now would be desirable,=
> dunno if that's possible, while shipping as much code as possible in a=20
> standard install (i.e. no pkgs, patch & compile orgies etc. required to=
> get things going).
No, XFree86/XOrg are completely unrelated. This is about the direct renderi=
module. The point anholt was trying to make was that we shouldn't use the D=
shipped with XFree86, but the one I have ported and am updating to the core
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----