--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 12:02:11PM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Too dark for my tastes I'm afraid. :(

i could lighten it a bit, i actually tried various shades of gray, but as i
said, the orange color then starts to dissolve to the background or the grey
parts of the logo are vanishing.. :/

  http://NetBSD.org/~salo/xdm-brighter.png

or are you opposed to the dark grey look altogether?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 07:01:32PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Richard Rauch wrote:
> >Maybe if the orange of the flag and the word "Net" (and the other
> >orange bits) were changed to a crimson, that would help?
>=20
> Um, orange is part of our *cough* corporate design. :)

hey, i didn't choose the colors!  i repeatedly say why i think they are
bad but nobody seems to listen.  i am just trying to save the situation
when we now look like a bunch of amateurs without even a slightest feel
for colors making our users say "yikes!" and turn with disgust in their
faces every time they have to log in using xdm..

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:49:23PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> Have you tried that on a machine with a black white display?

i made no changes to the 1bit nor <8bit parts of Xresources, they still
look the same as they did before.

> And besides that I like the current one better.

i sincerely hope you are just kidding..


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCNMxSiwjDDlS8cmMRArVpAJ90ReDo+WWSq81D6/UlSUPmRE+UeACfXfe4
CaxyEUs+Ef1sNeEeDSG0yBw=
=DKE3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--