Subject: Re: 2.0: can't build src/x11
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-x11
Date: 04/17/2004 12:23:56
--mpb+VUhBqKoEsre9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 11:14:07PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
| On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
| > I can't say whether this is the case this time but I would suggest no=
t using
| > anoncvs for xsrc before making changes to src/x11. Just to make sure=
it
| > isn't a broken tree.
|=20
| Indeed. I've found the real culprit is cvs(1), which doesn't tell you a=
ll
| the files that are in the local filesystem but not in the repository.
| Running "cvs -I\!" gives a good hint on what can really be removed (wel=
l,
| except that CVS/* stuff ;).
Try 'cvs -I\! -ICVS' to prevent the complaints about that CVS/* stuff.
| I've found symlinks and whatnot in the xsrc tree that I've used for ages
| before upgrading to 2.0, and I have no idea where they come from, but t=
hey
| do break the src/x11 build.
They're from doing "native" builds in xsrc, rather than reachover
builds in src/x11.
This is precisely why I've mentioned on numerous occasions to ensure
that people have "up to date clean source" before complaining that the
build infrastructure is "broken".
--mpb+VUhBqKoEsre9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFAgJU8pBhtmn8zJHIRAs2RAJ486JI+F86sJWzkLW/4wBUuXAJ/4ACfaTQW
9jZ6bVm9WZYQStVvZL6kycg=
=j8Z4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mpb+VUhBqKoEsre9--