On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:35:42PM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 12:18:02PM -0600, Richard Rauch wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:20:43AM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
 [...]
> > ...okay.  By "forget it", do you mean that I should also reverse the changes
> > you suggested to the Makefiles?  Or are they unimportant now, or still
> > necessary?
> 
> Makefiles patches are still needed ... Just forget the way to build
> XFree i previoulsy told you.

That's what I thought, and I started the build.  But I just wanted to
be sure, since I've not read through how the makefiles work for building
NetBSD and/or X.  (^&


> > > Here is what i'm currently using to upgrade my bi-Oteron box :
> > > 
> > > ./build.sh -Uu -m amd64 build
> > 
> > Do you need the "-m amd64" if you're building on an AMD64?  Or is
> > that just as a habit?
> 
> Just a habit. This is not needed when building on an amd64 box; but i
> use it a lot, on a 4-CPU i386 machine, to generate both i386/amd64
> sets.

Ah, again, as I figured.


The build is proceeding right now.  I hope that it makes it to the other
end in one piece.


-- 
  "I probably don't know what I'm talking about."  http://www.olib.org/~rkr/