On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:20:43AM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:52:13PM -0600, Richard Rauch wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> >  [...]
> > > cd src/x11
> > > make build
> > > make install DESTDIR=/
> > 
> > ....
> > rm -f SetSOwner.o.tmp
> > #   compile  static/SetSOwner.po
> > /usr/netbsd/current/src/obj.amd64/tooldir.NetBSD-1.6ZH-x86_64/bin/x86_64--netbsd-gcc -O2  -Werror    -DXTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API  -DXNO_MTSAFE_PWDAPI -DUSE_NBSD_THREADLIB -I. -DHAS_SNPRINTF -DLIBX11 -DPOSTLOCALELIBDIR=\"lib\" -DCSRG_BASED -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -I/usr/X11R6/include   -nostdinc -isystem /usr/include -c    -pg /usr/netbsd/current/xsrc/xfree/xc/lib/X11/SetSOwner.c -o SetSOwner.po.tmp
> > [1]   Segmentation fault (core dumped) make realall
> > *** Error code 139
> 
> Gasp !

Yeah, that was my thought.  (^&

Do I have broken tools?  Or bad memory?  (When I put this system together
initially, it had a bad memory module that I exchanged.  Unfortunately, I
don't know of any good memory tester and the BIOS memory tests flash by
without complaint.)

That it happens at the same time as the NFS freezes makes me doubt that it's
caused by memory.  (And that you get NFS freezes is some assurance that I'm
not generally suffering bad hardware.  (^&)

Maybe I should set up a local build directory and go without NFS?


> > Fourth...when I did the command as you had it above, I initially had a
> > problem with an "install" command that was unable to find the tooldir-built
> > "install" program.  (So maybe I had it 99% okay until I did a
> > "sh build.sh tools" and retried the "make build"?)  That failure was not
> > a signal, but was simply a "couldn't find .../nbinstall", so I did the
> > obvious thing of updating my tools.)
> 
> Ok, forget it (Sorry, i didn't tested it :-(). Let's try the build.sh
> way ...

...okay.  By "forget it", do you mean that I should also reverse the changes
you suggested to the Makefiles?  Or are they unimportant now, or still
necessary?


> Here is what i'm currently using to upgrade my bi-Oteron box :
> 
> ./build.sh -Uu -m amd64 build

Do you need the "-m amd64" if you're building on an AMD64?  Or is
that just as a habit?


Thanks again.  (^&


-- 
  "I probably don't know what I'm talking about."  http://www.olib.org/~rkr/