Subject: Re: MD xsets
To: Luke Mewburn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Frederick Bruckman <email@example.com>
Date: 09/19/2002 09:35:11
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 01:40:19PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> | In article <20020918204755.B5975@wiesel.intern>,
> | Thomas Gerner <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> | ./usr/X11R6/lib/X11/etc/sun.termcap
> | ./usr/X11R6/lib/X11/etc/sun.terminfo
> | ./usr/X11R6/lib/X11/etc/xterm.termcap
> | ./usr/X11R6/lib/X11/etc/xterm.terminfo
> | I wonder if these files are necessary at all. It looks like we don't
> | need "terminfo" and have "termcap" it the base system.
> Whether or not they're "X server related", at the moment the only MD
> x set we have is xserver.tgz.
> Speaking as a release engineer, we need to ensure that the sets are
> sanely split along MACHINE_ARCH shareable / machine independant /
> machine dependant lines.
> xserver MACHINE specific X server, possibly containing all of
> the other MACHINE specific stuff (unless we
> make another set for it)
I believe it's not unusual to install all the X sets *except* for
xserver. That's enough to build (and run!) all kinds of X packages
(assuming you have another host running an X server). So, assuming
that the files in question are actually needed for something besides
an X server, they should go into a new set.