On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 08:58:40PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:

 > Now does any one has any idea why an i386 asm statement is protected
 > with such a (literally) perverse conditional?  Isn't defined(__i386__)
 > test enough?  Unfortunately I cannot easily test compile on i386 at
 > the moment to verify that but see no reasons why it wouldn't.

I think changing that to #ifdef __i386__ is certainly appropriate.

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>