Re: Private symbols in libpcap, libmagic, libexpat

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:52:11PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> So it might be worthwhile to pull up the change _without_ a major bump
> even though that technically violates the rules.

Sounds OK, but obvious alternative: do not pull up at all.

> On the third hand, I put this off until after 10.1, so maybe it's a
> moot point and I should just bump the major (and recursively bump the
> major of all dependent libraries).

For -current that seems like a good idea.

Martin