tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Waiting for Randot (or: nia and maya were right and I was wrong)

[bcc tech-kern, tech-security, tech-crypto; followups to
tech-userlevel to keep discussion in one place]

Many of you have no doubt noticed that a lot more things hang waiting
for entropy than used to on machines without hardware random number
generators (even as we've added a bunch of new drivers for HWRNGs) --
e.g., python, firefox.

This is related to the adoption of the getrandom system call from
Linux, which we adopted with the semantics that getrandom(p,n,0) will
block until the kernel is certain there is enough entropy for

In retrospect, based on experience with the change, such as the
following threads and bugs (as well as many private discussions on
IRC), I think adopting getrandom with this semantics was a mistake:

It's certainly a problem when keys are generated with too little
entropy -- e.g., -- but it's increasingly clear
that _the middle of an application trying to get something else done_
is not a good place for hanging until someone plugs in a USB HWRNG.

Such an application, like a Python program in the middle of just doing
`import multiprocessing', is not in a position to remedy the situation
or even usefully alert an operator to the problem.  To better address
the system integration, I added hooks in /etc/rc and /etc/security for
alerting the operator to the problem with entropy:

- setting `entropy=check' in /etc/rc.conf will abort multiuser boot
  and enter single-user mode if there's not enough entropy before
  starting any network services (or setting `entropy=wait' will make
  multiuser boot hang -- caveat: possibly indefinitely)

- the daily /etc/security script will check for entropy and send an
  alert citing the new entropy(7) man page in the security report

We might also do something similar with the motd -- add a single line,
citing entropy(7) for more details, if there's not enough entropy.

With these in mind, I propose that we change getrandom(p,n,0) so that
it does not block -- under the premise that dealing with low entropy
is a system integration problem, not a problem that it is helpful to
ask an application to resolve in the heat of the sampling moment.

Programs can still poll /dev/random (or getrandom(p,n,GRND_RANDOM)),
if testing for entropy is actually their goal, but the default
recommended choice for all applications to generate keys, which is
getrandom(p,n,0), will not.

I also propose we introduce never-blocking getentropy like nia@
briefly did last year, as an alias for getrandom(p,n,0) soon to be in
POSIX (, under the
premise that the never-block semantics (from the original in OpenBSD)
is justified again by treating low entropy as a system integration


P.S.  Previous discussions about getrandom, getentropy, blocking, and
changes to the kernel entropy subsystem for NetBSD 10:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index