tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: vndconfig vs mount_cd9660



Thomas,

I just tested this with the install iso from a recent NetBSD current build
without issues.  One thing, however, is this:

  images[2]$disklabel /dev/vnd0
  ...
  4 partitions:
  #        size    offset     fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs]
   a:    848036         0    ISO9660       0             # (Cyl.      0 -    414*)
   d:    848036         0     unused      0     0        # (Cyl.      0 -    414*)
  disklabel: boot block size 0
  disklabel: super block size 0

Notice the fstype for partition a is ISO9660.  Yours reports 4.2BSD:

> The disklabel looks unpromising.
>
> 4 partitions:
> #        size    offset     fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs]
>  a:  16868776         0     4.2BSD      0     0     0  # (Cyl.      0 -   8236*)
>  d:  16868776         0     unused      0     0        # (Cyl.      0 -   8236*)
> disklabel: boot block size 0
> disklabel: super block size 0
>

You could try mounting vnd0a as ffs.

Aran

Attachment: pgpmhDAZvmkST.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index