tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: ssp, __strcpy_ck: just to be sure

To: NetBSD Discussion List User-Level Technical <tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: ssp, __strcpy_ck: just to be sure
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:27:18 +0100

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 02:11:15PM +0100, tlaronde%polynum.com@localhost wrote:
> But the lesson was that the __ssp_overlap succeeded to pinpoint the
> overlap with the buffer declared as an (fixed size) array but not when
> it was dynamically allocated.

Correct, the SSP primitives will only ever work for static buffers.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ssp, __strcpy_ck: just to be sure
  - From: Mouse

References:
- ssp, __strcpy_ck: just to be sure
  - From: tlaronde

Prev by Date: Re: ssp, __strcpy_ck: just to be sure
Next by Date: Re: ssp, __strcpy_ck: just to be sure
Previous by Thread: Re: ssp, __strcpy_ck: just to be sure
Next by Thread: Re: ssp, __strcpy_ck: just to be sure
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index