Re: LWP private cleanup in headers

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>]

On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 02:47:45AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 25.12.2019 02:45, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > 1. or1k + riscv define both __lwp_getprivate_fast() and __lwp_gettcb_fast().
> > 
> > Is there a point? Unless it is some ABI nit, it looks like a bug to me?
> > 
> > 2. Harmonize namespacing __lwp_getprivate_fast() and __lwp_gettcb_fast().
> > 
> > This is known issue to me abd it bites me from time to time, working for
> > one CPU and breaking on other as namespacing is inconsistent are different.
> > 
> > http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00210-x86-getprivate.txt
> > 
> 
> Wrong patch. The correct one is:
> 
> http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00211-getprivate-fast.txt

There is little reason to use __BEGIN_DECLS/__END_DECLS for static
inline functions.

Joerg