Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations

To: Jaromir Dolecek <jaromir.dolecek%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
From: maya%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 13:59:02 +0000

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:58:32AM +0200, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
> Please wait with any possible type switch couple more days, I’ll be back from vacations on Wednesday and I will check this by then. 
> 

ping

References:
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Jaromir Dolecek

Prev by Date: bmake: .if !empty(i:M[0-9]*)
Next by Date: Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
Previous by Thread: Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
Next by Thread: Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index