tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: updates?
Yeah, I will try to improve the code efficiency.
2016-07-27 10:14 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>:
> On Jul 27, 8:23am, charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | 3. there will be a concern if we count the number of signals each time,
> | but this sigcnts logic may can be merged with siggetinfo.
>
> Can you try doing that?
>
> | 2. I can add kassert around ret.
> | 1. I know sp cannot be NULL, and if it is NULL, the sigcnt is zero, what
> do
> | you mean of code would die (which piece of code)?
>
> I mean the code that unconditionally deleted the signal from the set.
>
> christos
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index