Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX

[Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>]

Well, in this case, what I suggest is that I try both things at the same
time and
see which part is more easily for me to make a breakthrough. Sounds good?
I will let you guys know my progress.


Thanks, Charles.

2016-07-04 23:24 GMT+08:00 Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>:

> On Jul 4,  4:34pm, martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:27:52AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | > SCHED_SPORADIC is also a feature that not many things use. So let's
> either
> | > try to make the PSHARED semaphores work for real (easier) or go for the
> | > realtime signal implementation (harder). Let's see what others think
> soo.
> |
> | I agree, but for PSHARED we would need discussion + consensus first,
> | which might be harder than implementing the realtime signals ;-}
>
> Yes, I know... I had exactly the same feeling... But realtime signals can
> be controversial too once you look at the implementation details.
>
> christos
>