Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX

[Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>]

Hi Christos,

    I have completed some unit tests for ad's work and run these unit tests
on two versions (my version and your version).
Your initial thinking is correct. There are bugs when getting and setting
different fields and these bugs can be
verified via my unit tests (it does not pass in my version, but pass in
your version).
Here are these patches.
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/commit/1a5bafe2691daf1755f7156d246f297568f7768b
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/commit/927e1ea5a3c9aa072ef7a18316903f6cf1a20056

Thanks Charles.

2016-06-14 16:19 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>:

> Thanks, I will complete my test cases as soon as possible.
>
> 2016-06-14 16:02 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>:
>
>> On Jun 14,  3:50pm, charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost (Charles Cui) wrote:
>> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>>
>> | I got it. Thanks Christos.
>>
>> And here it is:
>>
>> http://www.netbsd.org/~christos/pthread20160614.diff
>>
>> christos
>>
>
>