Re: pthread library related

To: Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>,
Subject: Re: pthread library related
From: SODA Noriyuki <soda%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 12:49:07 +0900

Forgot to say one thing...

>>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2016 12:44:57 +0900, SODA Noriyuki <soda%NetBSD.org@localhost> said:

>> How about other functions? Does it make sense to follow POSIX standard
>> to implement the missing functions in netbsd?

> In general, it's not recommended to add a stub function which returns
> ENOSYS (i.e. "Function not implemented") unless there is strong reason
> to do so.

Adding real implementation (instead of the ENOSYS stub) is desired,
of course...
-- 
soda

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Martin Husemann

References:
- pthread library related
  - From: Charles Cui
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: SODA Noriyuki
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Charles Cui
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: SODA Noriyuki

Prev by Date: Re: pthread library related
Next by Date: Re: pthread library related
Previous by Thread: Re: pthread library related
Next by Thread: Re: pthread library related
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index