[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
In article <21451069.KYs5RKkrsr%uberpc.marples.name@localhost>,
Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost> wrote:
>On Sunday 20 March 2016 23:05:12 Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <1547312.W6Y7Ml981D%uberpc.marples.name@localhost>,
>> Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost> wrote:
>> There is no need for pidfile_lock(), just fix pid_file() to return pid_t.
>> I've audited the code in the tree and the code that checks, checks for -1.
>> The compat code below is probably wrong anyway.
>Ah, but it needs to check for != 0 as it can return the pid who has the lock,
>which is itself an error.
Ok... I guess pidfile_lock it is.
Main Index |
Thread Index |