tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: How useful is modctl(8)'s display of 'address' field?
In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.1512020701320.2040%vps1.whooppee.com@localhost>,
Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost> wrote:
>In many cases the output from modctl(8) appears "ugly" due to lines
>being longer than (default terminal width of) 80 characters. Looking
>at the output, it seems to me that there isn't much usefulness (in
>userland) for displaying the kernel address of the module's address.
>
>I'd like to propose that, by default, we suppress the printing of the
>address field, and add a command line option to re-enable it. (As an
>alternative, we could add an option to suppress it, which would avoid
>changing default behavior.)
>
>Any comments? Objections?
sounds good to me.
christos
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index